Search for: "United States v. One Parcel of Real Estate Property" Results 81 - 100 of 121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2009, 9:26 am
An approved JD informs applicants that the USACE is asserting that the property contains waters of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 11:28 am by Arthur F. Coon
The Project and Its Background Real Party Sierra Pacific Industries (SPI) owns two large parcels of land in Martis Valley (unincorporated Placer County) between Truckee and Lake Tahoe; a 1,052-acre parcel on the west side (West Parcel), and a 6,376-acre parcel on the east side (East Parcel) of state route (SR) 267. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am by Arielle Harris
” SB 118: UC Enrollment Changes Not A CEQA “Project” Senate Bill 118 was the State Legislature’s targeted response to Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
  Perhaps a set of basic governance devices as models would serve a useful purpose as well.In any case, this has been a long time coming in the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Without more details or some facts from the BIA or the other side of the transaction, one could conclude that Small is a real estate opportunist. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 8:27 pm
  [29]  Given that the United States has a stronger position on the concept of property rights, it seems likely that similar cases will develop here. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 This case was not an action that fit within the provision of CCP §39 “[f]or the recovery of real property, or of an estate or interest therein, or for the determination in any form, of that right or interest, and for injuries to real property” or “[f]or the foreclosure of all liens and mortgages on real property. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
The award of final decision-making authority was not “dramatically unlike” the relief requested, as decision making is part and parcel to legal custody. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
LewisCourt: Colorado Supreme Court Docket: 10SC275 September 12, 2011 Judge: Hobbs Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Real Estate & Property Law, Zoning, Planning & Land Use In this case, the District Court for Jefferson County dismissed a condemnation petition for a private way of necessity because the developer of the allegedly landlocked parcel did not sufficiently define the scope of and necessity for the proposed condemnation. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am by stevemehta
JSM Construction, a Jones-related entity, was an active real estate developer in the City of Santa Monica (the City). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
”12 As Householder explains: It would be similarly fallacious to say that in a real estate transaction, the money paid to the seller is only a secondary consideration, with the primary value of the transaction consisting of the conveyance of the parcel to the buyer. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Since then, at least in the United States, the general partnership has been largely supplanted by other, statutorily enabled business forms providing limited liability, namely, corporations and, more recently, limited liability companies. [read post]