Search for: "United States v. One Parcel of Real Property"
Results 81 - 100
of 179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2017, 9:01 pm
The residential parcel is known as “Lot 9” in the 9-unit residential subdivision known as Hidden Hills. [read post]
18 May 2017, 8:44 pm
” Thompson v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 9:17 am
Aptos Council v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 10:55 am
At yesterday’s oral argument in Murr v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 2:11 pm
In Murr v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 6:48 am
The package was placed in the line with six other parcels of approximately the same size and shape, separated from one another by a couple of feet. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 6:51 am
How is listing one cross street vs. another ¼ mile away on a 60 acre parcel misleading? [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
Without more details or some facts from the BIA or the other side of the transaction, one could conclude that Small is a real estate opportunist. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 9:33 am
In Murray v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 9:33 am
In Murray v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 9:33 am
In Murray v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:27 am
The Landmark Towers Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:27 am
The Landmark Towers Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 2:42 pm
A `material fact’ is one that affects the outcome of the suit. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:46 pm
This is an appeal from an amended opinion and order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, dismissing at the pleadings stage all federal claims against the defendants on qualified immunity grounds because the plaintiffs had not adequately alleged that their constitutional rights were violated, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Most all agree that the United States Supreme Court will ultimately decide the question of the legitimacy of the Rule. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 11:44 am
In Lingerman v. 6 Mill Road, LLC (Ct. [read post]
