Search for: "United States v. One Parcel of Real Property With Buildings"
Results 21 - 40
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2021, 9:39 pm
United States, supra, at 175, 100 S.Ct., at 390. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Relying on the “functional test” set forth in a line of cases distinguishing discretionary decisions from ministerial ones (e.g., Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Relying on the “functional test” set forth in a line of cases distinguishing discretionary decisions from ministerial ones (e.g., Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Maolin Ninth Circuit Opinion (ACLU) United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The facts involve a relatively small project on 8.2 acres, and the developer’s plan was to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, with a mixed-use project on 6.23 acres and the balance of 1.98 acres as an open space lot. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Golden Door Properties LLC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
County of Butte v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
City of Berkeley (2019) 31 Cal.App.5th 880 Real parties filed for approvals to construct three homes on contiguous parcels in the Berkeley hills. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
City of Berkeley (2019) 31 Cal.App.5th 880 Real parties filed for approvals to construct three homes on contiguous parcels in the Berkeley hills. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), that petitioners’ property should be evaluated as a single parcel because, among other reasons, “the treatment of the property under state and local law indicates petitioners’ property should be treated as one when considering the effects of the restrictions. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), that petitioners’ property should be evaluated as a single parcel because, among other reasons, “the treatment of the property under state and local law indicates petitioners’ property should be treated as one when considering the effects of the restrictions. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
In this interim period, many events can affect value of the property, especially changes in the real estate market and rezoning of the property. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
” Dorrance describes the “despotic power” of the right to take property not as one of despots, but quite simply one of the legislative branch. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
In July 2009, Darius was re-appointed by Governor Jennifer Granholm to sit on the Michigan State Board of Real Estate Appraisers, which provides licensure to state licensed and state certified real estate appraisers and real estate valuation specialists. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
A property owner sought a demolition permit (for an existing dilapidated home) and design approval for an eight-unit multi-family building. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
The pre-sale inspection procedure usually requires the property owner to complete an application, schedule and appear for an inspection of the property with a code official, pay an inspection fee, and correct or otherwise address identified violations of the municipality’s fire, zoning, building, and/or property maintenance codes in order to obtain a certificate of occupancy authorizing the property’s sale or rental. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
The pre-sale inspection procedure usually requires the property owner to complete an application, schedule and appear for an inspection of the property with a code official, pay an inspection fee, and correct or otherwise address identified violations of the municipality’s fire, zoning, building, and/or property maintenance codes in order to obtain a certificate of occupancy authorizing the property’s sale or rental. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:21 pm
The land was zoned to allow for one dwelling unit per acre; however, Pulte could increase the allowable density to two units per acre by purchasing TDRs from agricultural properties in a different area of Montgomery County. [read post]
