Search for: "United States v. Ortega"
Results 41 - 60
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
United States, 961 F.2d 17, 20-22 (1st Cir. 1992); United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
” Ortega v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:03 pm
" A sentiment that I personally happen to agree with.But then he drops a footnote that says: "Unlike dogfighting, which is illegal everywhere in the United States, cockfighting remains legal in Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:46 am
The safety of women and their children has been identified as the priority that states should address, not the privacy of the family unit, an abusive man’s property rights over the shared/marital home or the right of parental contact. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:46 am
The safety of women and their children has been identified as the priority that states should address, not the privacy of the family unit, an abusive man’s property rights over the shared/marital home or the right of parental contact. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 10:35 am
(Weirdly appropriate, for a “crack” case . . .)United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 4:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
Ortega, 480 U.S. 709 (1987). [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:56 am
Ortega, 480 U.S. 709 (1987) (citing Mancusi v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:50 am
During the recent oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am
It was Arzú who had just persuaded the United Nations to take Guatemala off its blacklist. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
It is the defendant’s contention that judgment was obtained in violation of a right of his right under the constitution of this state or of the United States pursuant to C.P.L. 440.10(1)(h). [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
(collectively “Valois”) appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia based on: (1) the construction of several terms in U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 10:11 am
District Court in Phoenix issued a 142-page decision against Sheriff Joe Arpaio and the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) in Ortega Melendres v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:05 am
Citing People v Weaver (12 NY3d 433) and United States v Jones (132 S Ct 945, the Court of Appeals ruled that the State's action was a search within the meaning of the State and Federal Constitutions but that under the relevant facts in this case “did not require a warrant. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:39 pm
” United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:40 am
The recall effort against Cook, Byrd and Ortega was anchored in Brown’s church. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 3:43 am
Hov IP II, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:15 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
