Search for: "United States v. Oscar" Results 21 - 40 of 220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2023, 11:00 pm
”While she was under 21, since this young person happened to be married, the AD2 let the denial and dismissal stand.There goes the bride.# # #DECISIONMatter of Elena G.R. v Oscar D.V.H. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:09 pm
In a stunning victory, Mineola criminal defense lawyer Oscar Michelen prevailed before the Appellate Division, Second Department in having the indictment thrown out against labor lawyer Felix Vinluan for advising 10 Filipino nurses who had been fraudulently induced to come to the United States to work for a SentosaCare nursing home. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 11:15 am
  MacLean then asked the court to take judicial notice of the Ninth Circuit's definition of asbestos in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:31 am by David Oscar Markus
United States, the Court’s latest decision regarding the Confrontation Clause and nonconfessing codefendants. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:46 am by David Oscar Markus
United States, which entails a legal issue that was the subject of the 2023 Gibbons Criminal Procedure Moot Court Competition, where my partner, Gaby Pinzon, and I represented the University of Miami School of Law in winning First Place at the competition. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:47 pm by David Lat
Recall his famous ruling in the movie-industry case of United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:46 am by Lyle Denniston
  Justice Elena Kagan is not participating in this case. * United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:32 am by John L. Welch
Mere Descriptiveness: Both Opposers testified that they escaped from Cuba to the United States in a program organized by the United States government and dubbed "Operation Pedro Pan. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:29 pm by Phillip V. Marano
"  In 1802, "prints" were added (2 Stat. 171); in 1831 "musical compositions" were added (4 Stat. 436); in 1856 "dramatic compositions" were added (11 Stat. 138); and in 1856 "photographs" were added (13 Stat. 540).The primary issue addressed by the United States Supreme Court in 1884 was whether "Congress had the constitutional right to protect photographs and negatives thereof by copyright. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 10:03 am
This would almost certainly never occur in the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Roos & Anita Mackay, A Shift in the United Nations Human Rights Committee's Jurisprudence on Marriage Equality? [read post]