Search for: "United States v. Osman"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
This week, a federal court in Oregon rebuffed him; the following post summarizes the most recent developments in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 12:57 pm
” United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:20 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:20 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am
London Borough of Enfield [2001] 2 AC 550, per Lord Browne-Wilkinson; this terminology was misunderstood by the ECtHR in Osman v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:33 am
Savage; Powell v United Kingdom [2000] 30 EHRR CD 362). [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 12:45 pm
” United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
It is established in Strasbourg and domestic jurisprudence that in certain “well-defined circumstances” art 2 will impose “a positive obligation on [state] authorities to take preventative operational measure” to protect the life of an individual (Osman v UK (2009) 29 EHRR 245 at 115). [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
The Trust argued that the reasoning in Osman v United Kingdom (23452/94) (1999) 1 FLR 193 ECHR was not applicable to the care of hospital patients. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm
They are being held in the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:45 pm
… (extracts), Osman v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 12:13 pm
As Ars reported back in January 2016, the case (United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:26 pm
As for Article 2, the Court referred extensively to the Strasbourg case of Osman v United Kingdom , which set out the positive obligations, implied by Article 2, on the state to protect life. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 1:19 am
Mustafa Ozsusamlar and Osman OzsusamlarU.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:04 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeProsecution of Doctor Accused of Agreeing to Treat Jihadists for al Qaeda Is Deemed Constitutional United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v DD (Afghanistan) [2010] EWCA Civ 1407 (10 December 2010) December 10, 2010 Asylum seeker not protected from deportation as he had carried out acts contrary to the principles of the United Nations. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
The case that it widely seen as the foundation of the ‘operational duty’ is Osman v United Kingdom (2000) 29 EHRR 245, in which a family complained that the police had not done enough to protect them from threats and harassment that had culminated in murder. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am
It annexes to its moving papers a copy of the June 24, 2016 Loft Board letter to Plaintiff stating that the harassment finding remained in place and the second and fifth floor units were still subject to rent regulation under the Loft Law (NYSCEF Doc. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 3:31 am
“Whether he wants to or not, Secretary Gates can effect a release in the United States….Because there is no dispute about this, and no compliance is forthcoming, a finding of contempt is now warranted. [read post]
