Search for: "United States v. Page" Results 261 - 280 of 9,825
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2017, 6:58 am by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
This past week, the Sixth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the United States District Court in the case of Sun Life Assurance Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm by Josh Blackman
Generally, the only route of appeal from a state court of last resort is to the United States Supreme Court through certiorari. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
In other words, they can throw the entire issue back to the District of Columbia (which is not a State of the United States) or to the States. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 10:02 am by John Bursch
As many expected, the United States Supreme Court today issued its opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am by Paul M. Hauge
Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) released the latest chapter in this five-decade-long saga in the form of a new 514-page rule defining “waters of the United States” (WOTUS). [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am by Paul M. Hauge
Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) released the latest chapter in this five-decade-long saga in the form of a new 514-page rule defining “waters of the United States” (WOTUS). [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am by Paul M. Hauge
Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) released the latest chapter in this five-decade-long saga in the form of a new 514-page rule defining “waters of the United States” (WOTUS). [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 12:54 pm by Immigration Prof
Steve Vladeck on Just Security writes about a spectacular new court of appeals decision: In a breathtaking 80-page opinion handed down today in Castro v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 4:52 am
READ the FULL TEXT INDICTMENT United States of America v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
  The Fourteenth Amendment just implies (at most) that states can take away the right of felons to vote, not that it should (and certainly not that it must). [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:48 am by Bexis
We recently noticed that there are finally official United States Reports page numbers for Wyeth v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:33 pm
 And finally from pages 190-205 is another dissent (about standing):In their haste to reach the merits of the plaintiffs’ Establishment Clause claim, my colleagues in the majority neglect to follow the longstanding and well-defined requirements of Article III of the United States Constitution. [read post]