Search for: "United States v. Paramount Pictures" Results 21 - 40 of 99
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2011, 7:26 am by Russell Jackson
United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981) -- also cited by plaintiffs -- the court cautioned that: The State's power over the beds of navigable waters remains subject to only one limitation:  the paramount power of the United States to ensure that such waters remain free to interstate and foreign commerce. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
  It follows that it is the pictures used to depict the event, rather than the event itself that has now--after a very long gestation as the practices of traditional press outlets changed to suit the times and their taste for direct political engagement--become not just its representation but also its  management. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:50 pm by Barry Sookman
Fitness Industry Council of Canada, 2014 FCA 48 Canadian Association of Film Distributors and Exporters v SODRAC 2014 FCA 235 Private Copying 2015, Copyright Board, December 12, 2014 United States American Broadcasting v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  By way of background, the publisher filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 23, 2011, against eBook publisher, Open Road Integrated Media. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  By way of background, the publisher filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 23, 2011, against eBook publisher, Open Road Integrated Media. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  By way of background, the publisher filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 23, 2011, against eBook publisher, Open Road Integrated Media. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:39 am by Jon Gelman
Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case  which decided that benefits given by the United States military to the family of service members cannot be given out differently because of sex.Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated at oral argument:"Mr. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm by Larry
Like the court in GRK, Customs and Border Protection looked back to an old case call United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Collateral estoppel and res judicata protect litigants from repetitive lawsuits, promotes judicial economy, and preserves the integrity of the judicial system (Paramount Pictures Corp. v Allianz Risk Transfer AG, 31 NY3d 64, 73 [2018] [Paramount]). [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 10:00 am by Scott Hervey
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently addressed the issue of novelty as an element of an idea theft claim in Wexler v Hasbro. [read post]