Search for: "United States v. Paramount Pictures"
Results 61 - 80
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2014, 8:08 pm
Apr. 24, 2014) State of Indiana v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:08 am
In 2011, the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals considered an employee’s appeal following his termination for FMLA misuse. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 11:16 am
Paramount Pictures, Inc., 334 US 131, 158 (1948). [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm
Last year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided largely in favour of Mr. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/TWdAOrAlln -> Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:49 am
The court emphasized that a split in the circuits would be a problem as copyright law is a matter of federal law and is intended to be applied uniformly throughout the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 2:00 pm
Remanded.Read more: Top state court says woman who donated egg to female partner has parental rightsState v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Introduction Cuba has been facing increasingly challenging economic problems since the fall of the Soviet Union[1] and the end of the Soviet system of state-to-state based economic activity.[2] In the absence of Soviet aid, and in the face of U.S. political and economic hostility,[3] Cuba has sought new partners and allies.[4] Cuba also has increasingly experimented with innovative ways of organizing economic activity that avoid reducing the paramount power of the… [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
The United States Supreme Court weighed the Right of Publicity against first amendment rights in the case of Zacchini v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:37 am
Instead, ´what is critical is how the work in question appears to the reasonable observer’ (following Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994) and Leibovitz v Paramount Pictures Corp., 137 F.3d 109, 113-14 (2d Cir 1998). [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:39 am
The Second Circuit’s 2008 decision in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:38 am
” Ah, but no less considerable a legal authority than the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has determined that, more likely than not, Aereo is not doing anything illegal. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
This is especially helpful because the legal and colloquial definitions of monopoly differ throughout history — the term means something different under the current Sherman Antitrust Act, to someone during the era of trust-busting in early 20th century United States, and to a jurist in 18th century England. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
She added: “The upside is to create a system which can rebuild trust between the press and the public, which of course is paramount, but which allows freedom of expression“. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
By way of background, the publisher filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 23, 2011, against eBook publisher, Open Road Integrated Media. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
By way of background, the publisher filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 23, 2011, against eBook publisher, Open Road Integrated Media. [read post]
