Search for: "United States v. Parcel I, Beginning at a Stake"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2016, 6:48 am
State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:14 pm
Indeed, he argues, the government presented no evidence of Hatim’s conduct that post-dated October of 2001, when the United States got involved in Afghanistan, or even September 11. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
”Once it was established that adults in the United States had the right to buy and use contraception, the attention shifted to access. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
I start by posting Professor Ruggie’s closing plenary remarks to United Nations Forum on Business & Human Rights in Geneva on December 4, 2014. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
Beginning in the late 20th century, China became thesingle largest driver of energy demand growth in the world. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
As starting salaries for beginning associates (who have not been admitted to the bar and therefore unable to practice before the courts by themselves) have long surpassed the salary of a Supreme Court justice, the judges of this state have indeed fallen down the Rabbit Hole. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am
Since then, at least in the United States, the general partnership has been largely supplanted by other, statutorily enabled business forms providing limited liability, namely, corporations and, more recently, limited liability companies. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:24 pm
Arguments of the parties and the United States The city’s merits brief begins with the statute of limitations issue, not reaching the Fourth Amendment versus due process issue until page 35. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
His passing meant that I had to find a different way to address Citizens United in the book. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:26 am
He begins his opinion – a landmark for gay rights – with a quote from the infamous 1896 case of Plessy v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
Instead, he agrees with the logic and methodology approved in Matter of Murphy (United States Dredging Corp.), 74 AD3d 815 (2d Dept 2010) (read here my post on Murphy), requiring a present value computation of the gains taxes to be paid at a projected future date, here, at the end of the assumed 10-year holding period. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Ruegg & Ellsworth v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
