Search for: "United States v. Paris"
Results 101 - 120
of 785
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2019, 12:12 am
Together with The Picasso Project, the Zervos has been the subject of a long legal battle which ended last week with a decision of the the United States District Court Northern District of California San Jose Division.BackgroundIn 1979, Yves Sicre de Fontbrune, the original plaintiff in the case, acquired Cahiers d’art and the rights to the Zervos.In 1995 Wofsy published The Picasso Project.In 1996, after copies of two volumes of The Picasso Project were… [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 7:58 am
The video, however, did not “indicate” knowledge or use in the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 8:58 am
Then Caliburger cooked up it’s next plan: restaurants in the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:00 am
§ 1609 provides that ““the property in the United States of a foreign state shall be immune from attachment arrest and execution. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 8:48 am
McKnight v Torres, April 20, 2009. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:37 am
Thirty years ago, the United States joined the U.N. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:27 am
No special legislation in the United States was necessary to make it effective. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:17 pm
Without proof of such allegations, I would think any prosecution for fraud in this country would violate the First Amendment under an old case, United States v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:36 am
Furthermore, while Section 44 was “generally intended” to implement elements of the Paris Convention, In re Rath, 402 F.3d at 1207, 74 USPQ2d at 1177, it does not, through subsections 44(b) or (h) or otherwise, provide the user of an assertedly famous foreign trademark with an independent basis for cancellation in a Board proceeding, absent use of the mark in the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:46 am
The decision was upheld by Cour D’Appel de Paris. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 10:50 pm
United States (SCOTUS, 1966) Miller v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:59 pm
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution provides that "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:02 pm
” Khamenei also accused the United States of trying to divide Iraq along sectarian lines and urged Iraqis to oppose any such U.S. efforts. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 12:27 am
ITC Limited v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 1:07 pm
It appears that European courts are less tolerant of bullying record industry lawyers than in the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 7:25 am
ZTE and Conversant v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:50 am
June 20, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the Trustee of Bernard L. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am
United States, during which Justice Stephen Breyer drew from popular culture headlines with a hypothetical question based on “the recent Kim Kardashian jewelry heist in Paris. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:09 am
In both Gonzalez and Taamneh, the Solicitor General will also be arguing on behalf of the United States. [read post]
