Search for: "United States v. Paris Wells"
Results 21 - 40
of 433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2016, 4:30 am
I mention this because it runs loosely to a theme of this book: American diplomats in the field are not usually in Paris or Tokyo or even Moscow. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 3:23 am
The Board observed that the "well known mark" doctrine does not provide a basis for a Section 2(d) claim, nor does the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement. [read post]
3 Jun 2017, 6:07 am
Second, President Trump made an announcement that the United States will withdraw from the Paris Agreement on climate change. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:46 am
Lederer de Paris Fifth Ave., Inc. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:43 am
(“Applicant’s demonstrated pattern of filing applications to register various well-known marks convinces us that applicant’s adoption of the L’OREAL PARIS mark was in bad faith, with the intention to trade off of opposer’s famous L’OREAL and L’OREAL PARIS marks”).Meenaxi maintained that it has priority of use in the United States, but it acknowledged that Coca-Cola "need not establish priority for its… [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 10:01 am
In an unpublished decision today, United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
The courts in the United States do not recognize the "well-known mark" basis for relief (but see Grupo Gigante v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:50 am
” The Supreme Court may soon consider another case involving online services, as well. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 10:50 pm
United States (SCOTUS, 1966) Miller v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 2:23 pm
This waitress has, for her head, an oversized photograph of Paris Hilton’s head, and is engaged in witty banter with the customer wherein the cartoon waitress with the oversized Paris Hilton head states Paris’ trademarked (yes, she did file for Federal trademark protection) phrase, “That’s Hot. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:27 am
No special legislation in the United States was necessary to make it effective. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:04 am
’’; Whereas, on March 13, 2015, Central Intelligence Agency Director Brennan stated, ‘‘ISIL is well-armed and well-financed. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 2:30 am
” United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 10:28 am
Seems to mesh well with the CCA's previous discussion of FSTOC in Cheney v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
In the United States, those who are unhappy with a policy outcome can avail themselves of the courts to seek relief. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:04 am
” In her dissent, Justice Budd vehemently stated that the controlling opinion “allows for an encroachment upon an individual’s right to be free from an unreasonable search and seizure provided for in both art. 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights and the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:42 am
The Times reports that North Korea has attempted to strike a deal with the United States: the dictatorship would halt its nuclear tests in exchange for the United States suspending routine military exercises with South Korea. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:42 am
The Second Circuit agrees with the district court.The case is United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:07 pm
United States. [read post]
