Search for: "United States v. Park" Results 261 - 280 of 4,139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(I will note that even the hallowed grounds of pitching mounds in major league baseball parks are now stamped with corporate logos.) [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am by David Kopel
In August, The Trace presented a conspiracy about the amicus briefs filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 3:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
Public housing constitutes both an individual's home and a building owned by a state's government; however, it remains largely unsettled whether public housing developments could constitutionally prohibit firearm possession under both the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and nearly identical provisions of certain state constitutions. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
I previously wrote about the latest New York gun law passed after the Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 11:04 am by Lawrence Taylor
  However, none of this is meant to diminish the seriousness of the drunk driving epidemic, which is far from over in the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:03 pm by NARF
United States Department of the Interior (Administrative Procedure Act; Indian Gaming Regulatory Act) The Chickasaw Nation v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Many are reported to be seeking asylum.[1] They have active proceedings to determine their status and, pending such determination, are authorized to remain in the United States. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 9:05 am by Guest Author
A case that the Supreme Court will hear in the October, 2022 Term, United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 10:04 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Wasserstein & JP Ellison —In a recent JAMA editorial (unfortunately behind a paywall), three authors called for increased use of the Park Responsible Corporate Officer doctrine, under which senior level officials at a company can be held liable under a strict liability theory even if they were not involved in, or even knew about, the alleged violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:22 pm by Unknown
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html United States of America v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:30 am by jonathanturley
The United States has long drawn a line between the work of federal employees in public service and the use of such employees for political purposes. [read post]