Search for: "United States v. Parse"
Results 1 - 20
of 578
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 10:10 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm
Scott & Anor v Scott | [1913] AC 417 | United Kingdom House of Lords | Judgment | Law | CaseMine In a lengthy footnote, the dissent parses the majority’s conclusion and citations related to divorce being open to public scrutiny. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 7:19 am
ShareAs securities cases go, Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:12 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court on Tuesday signaled that it was likely to allow mifepristone, one of two drugs used in medication abortions, to remain widely available in the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:17 am
" But then in House v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
United States will be heard on the last day of scheduled arguments this term, and the Court is expected to issue its final decisions for the current term in late June. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
The other more content-specific carriage mandates and exceptions in the laws, like Florida’s rules for journalism and speech by or about candidates, are hard to parse for separate drafting-based reasons, and open the door to a separate strain of litigation. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:48 am
Court of Appeals in Thaler v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
To our knowledge, none of these sources attempt to parse the text. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
Nearly all of the interested parties support keeping the settlement in place but the United States government--in its capacity as what Deputy SG Curtis Gannon called its "watchdog" role--objected that the bankruptcy court lacks authority to release third parties like the Sacklers (who did not file for personal bankruptcy) from liability. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
Voting is now open! [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
A decision by a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit late last month concerning Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), in Arkansas State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am
[with implications for the pending Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
” In 2021 we published an article concluding “that the President is not a Section 3 ‘officer of the United States. [read post]
