Search for: "United States v. Pender" Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2010, 9:33 am by Ashby Jones
United States, holding that the First Amendment did not stand in the way of 2005’s Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act’s prohibition on bankruptcy advisers giving certain kinds of advice to clients. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Gregory Ablavsky
The history of Indian Territory, Oklahoma statehood, and the Creek and other Native nations is, like much Native history in the United States, tangled; if you are interested, you can find an amicus brief that I joined that delves into that complexity here. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am by Mark Zamora
App. 558, 559-60 (1986); United Motor Freight Terminal Company Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:48 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
 We’re talking about the jurisdiction of the United States as well. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:14 am by Florian Mueller
House of Representativesin response to the United States International Trade Commission's mid-December notice relating to the ITC's investigation of Qualcomm's first complaint against Apple (with Qualcomm seeking an import ban, which is the ITC's sole remedy).The United States Senators and United States Representatives who filed those letters, which support Administrative Law Judge Thomas B. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:56 pm by Will Baude
In fact, everyone, from Nebraska to the Tribe to the United States treated Pender as not part of the reservation for over a century. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 10:46 am by Florian Mueller
Ron Katznelson, a former Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of California in Qualcomm's home town of San Diego, told the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) in a public-interest statement that there are dozens of alternative technologies to the asserted claim 31 of U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:38 pm by Florian Mueller
(This works the same way in the United States, by the way.)The actual economic impact of this enforcement on Apple remains to be seen. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm by Mark Zamora
App. 558, 559-60 (1986); United Motor Freight Terminal Company Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
App. 558, 559-60 (1986); United Motor Freight Terminal Company Inc. v. [read post]