Search for: "United States v. Perez Rivera" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2013, 6:41 am by Joy Waltemath
Rejecting the notion that applying the general FLSA regulation for reimbursement of travel expenses on top of the specific H-2A rule would render the latter superfluous, the Ninth Circuit revived a claim for immigration and travel expenses brought by H-2A workers whose expenses in procuring employment and traveling to the United States dropped their pay below the minimum wage (Rivera Rivera v Peri & Sons Farms, Inc, November 13, 2013,… [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6357, Rivera v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm by Stephen Bilkis
At the time the first allegation of mistreatment was received in January 1977, plaintiffs' parents were receiving counseling under the auspices of Manhattan Family Court, where they were monitored by the Home Advisory Unit and received court [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Appraisal - Commercial 2 Mike Akerly Indigo Sky Properties Development 3 meir the babaev group developer 2 shanell rhodes Investor Investor / Owner 1 Giampolo Rivera Cantor Fitzgerald Investor / Owner 2 Paul Menendez, Jr. [read post]