Search for: "United States v. Pierce" Results 341 - 360 of 603
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2016, 4:55 am by Amy Howe
United States, holding that the pretrial restraint of a criminal defendant’s untainted asset violates the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
The United States was founded in 1776, and our founding document is the Declaration of Independence that was unanimously adopted by the Congress of the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm by Stephen Wm. Smith
” As applied to older technologies, the rule contemplates that a tracking device may be a mechanical tool used to track the movement of a tangible object., like the beeper attached to a container of chloroform in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
”[1] Chair Lina Khan has previously voiced her support for doing so.[2] My view is that the Commission has no such rulemaking powers, and that the scope of the authority asserted would amount to an unconstitutional delegation of power by the Congress.[3] Others have written about those issues, and we can leave them for another day.[4] Professors Richard Pierce and Gus Hurwitz have each written that, if FTC rulemaking is to survive judicial scrutiny, it must apply to conduct that is… [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 8:00 am by Greene LLP
Whyte with three counts of major fraud against the United States, seven counts of wire fraud, and three counts of false, fictitious, and fraudulent claims. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
This is the Iowa cerebral palsy resource guide; this guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
Today the United States asks this court to reconsider and overrule its decision in Roe v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:35 am by Trey Childress
As was recently reported on this blog, in September the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit entered an important decision in Kiobel v. [read post]