Search for: "United States v. Pierce" Results 561 - 580 of 645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2009, 7:12 am
Issue: Whether the antifraud provisions of the United States securities laws extend to transnational frauds where: (a) the foreign-based parent company conducted substantial business in the United States and (b)the claims arose from an accounting fraud perpetrated by American citizens at the parent company's Florida based subsidiary, and whether subject matter jurisdiction extends to transnational fraud-on-the-market claims. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:42 pm
Carlisle: The United States Supreme Court Says that Non-Signatories Can Enforce Arbitration Agreements Whenever State Law Would Permit them to Enforce Contracts Generally, Philip J. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:51 am
If this kind of Islam grows and prospers in the United States - and this is already happening - it will not stay there. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
However the court upheld the dismissal of plaintiff's challenge to the frequency of religious services in his prison unit. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:45 am
  A recent case from the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 7:55 pm
  That legal challenge went all the way to the United States Supreme Court (the highest court in our country), which ruled in favor of Anna Nicole Smith in 2006. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 3:51 pm
United States, 384 F.2d 391, 404 (Ct. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 5:37 am
Fisher, Visiting Professor of Law at the Franklin Pierce Law Center in Concord, New Hampshire. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:40 am
  According to the Court's opinion, the Museum housed "exhibits, antiques, artifacts, and general materials relating to the development of the railroad industry in North Carolina and the United States as a whole. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 1:24 am
Supreme Court in the 1943 case of United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 1:58 pm
That was for the specific reason that one of the important Indian cases on the point - State of UP v. [read post]