Search for: "United States v. Pink"
Results 121 - 140
of 209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
The case was initially sealed while the United States and the state of Wisconsin determined whether to intervene. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
By Tyler Baker and Ted Max On September 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited and highly anticipated decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:44 am
By Tyler Baker and Ted Max On September 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited and highly anticipated decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm
In 2008, Louboutin registered his red lacquered outsole with the United States Patent and Trademark Office as a design mark (U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:48 am
" In People v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
The BA First bed only extended in the pink and was therefore not novelty destroying. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:19 am
The order by United States District Judge Martha G. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 8:04 am
Complicating desegregation even further: a 2007 United States Supreme Court ruling that restricted schools in selecting students. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am
First up is Lucy Reed of Pink Tape. [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:25 am
By 2001, Cuervo began marketing this tequila in the United States with a red dripping-wax seal over the cap of the bottle. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:55 pm
Open justice David Hart QC has blogged on the UKHRB on the recent decision by the Court of Appeal in R (on the application of Guardian Newspapers) v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
In Rogers v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Second, the Court of Appeals adumbrated the key rule as whether the “seller incurred irrevocable liability with the United States to deliver a security” or that “title was transferred within the United States”. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 8:55 am
The article also dismissed this claim as overly “ambitious” for a company that “trades at only eight cents per share on the lowly ‘pink sheets’ in the United States”. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 8:52 am
The article also dismissed this claim as overly “ambitious” for a company that “trades at only eight cents per share on the lowly ‘pink sheets’ in the United States”. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Judge Noonan, writing for the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, just clarified an issue on hearsay, the so-called state of mind exception, in a case titled Wagner v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:36 am
Fischer, The Utah Bioprospecting Act of 2010: (Unintentional) State-Level Implementation of the United Nations Convention on Biodiversity, Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law, Winter 2012. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 10:51 am
Seems okay so far.At the jail, he gets assessed as having psychological problems, so he's going to be transferred to the psych unit at the jail. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:11 am
In its June 2010 decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:39 am
The United Kingdom – 31965/07 [2012] ECHR 261 (14 February 2012). [read post]
