Search for: "United States v. Pisciotta"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2013, 2:39 pm
Starbucks Corp., 628 F.3d 1139 (9th Cir. 2010) (threat of future identity theft sufficient to confer standing) and Pisciotta v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 9:41 am
The 7th Circuit issued an opinion Thursday in Pisciotta et al v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:07 pm
” In support of its conclusion, the Third Circuit cited cases that were dismissed because the alleged future harm was deemed “neither imminent nor certainly impending,” distinguishing decisions in Pisciotta v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:07 pm
” In support of its conclusion, the Third Circuit cited cases that were dismissed because the alleged future harm was deemed “neither imminent nor certainly impending,” distinguishing decisions in Pisciotta v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:26 pm
Indeed, as Judge Buckles observed in his opinion, subsequent to the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Pisciotta v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:52 pm
United States, 306 F.3d 938, 947-48 (9th Cir. 2002); and Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:11 am
Some courts, like the Seventh Circuit in Pisciotta v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 12:19 pm
According to the Plaintiff, it is a violation of the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution:[T]he defendants have irrationally and intentionally treated the plaintiff differently from others identically situated to the plaintiff, in violation of the plaintiff’s right to equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution as enforced through Sections 1983 and 1988 of Title 42 of… [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 2:59 pm
The Supreme Court stated in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:30 am
In the primary Seventh Circuit case decided before Clapper involving standing in the data breach context, Pisciotta v. [read post]
