Search for: "United States v. Pleasant" Results 81 - 100 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2010, 11:47 am by Kedar
Heller – Agreed 25-Mar United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 6:53 am
In 2000, the United States Supreme Court decided Troxel v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:15 pm
From the Feb. 2009 issue of Engage:Kimberlee Wood Colby, Monumentally Speaking: Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
It's always a pleasant surprise to see legal disputes that involve fish for nonsensical reasons, particularly fish-related disputes that may be heard by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
It's always a pleasant surprise to see legal disputes that involve fish for nonsensical reasons, particularly fish-related disputes that may be heard by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:59 pm by Josh Blackman
" He said, "Taney is making the case that Black people who were enslaved were never part of the people of the United States and could never be citizens. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 1:07 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeEvidence Showed Defendant Knew Cathinone A Controlled Substance, Conspiracy to Distribute United States, appellee v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 9:00 pm by The JAG HUNTER
., Captain, Medical Corps, United States Navy THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON The President of the United States takes pleasure in presenting the PRESIDENTIAL UNIT CITATION to the UNITED STATES SHIP COLE for service as set forth in the following CITATION: “For outstanding performance as guide for the first wave of landing boats in the attack on Safi, French Morocco, November 8, 1942. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:00 pm by The JAG HUNTER
., Captain, Medical Corps, United States Navy THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON The President of the United States takes pleasure in presenting the PRESIDENTIAL UNIT CITATION to the UNITED STATES SHIP COLE for service as set forth in the following CITATION: “For outstanding performance as guide for the first wave of landing boats in the attack on Safi, French Morocco, November 8, 1942. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by The JAG HUNTER
., Captain, Medical Corps, United States Navy THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON The President of the United States takes pleasure in presenting the PRESIDENTIAL UNIT CITATION to the UNITED STATES SHIP COLE for service as set forth in the following CITATION: “For outstanding performance as guide for the first wave of landing boats in the attack on Safi, French Morocco, November 8, 1942. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm by The JAG HUNTER
., Captain, Medical Corps, United States Navy   THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON The President of the United States takes pleasure in presenting the PRESIDENTIAL UNIT CITATION to the UNITED STATES SHIP COLE for service as set forth in the following CITATION: “For outstanding performance as guide for the first wave of landing boats in the attack on Safi, French Morocco, November 8, 1942. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:02 am by Kashmir Hill
Cell phones are addictive, I suppose…The opinion cites United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Marcovitz, (Dalhousie Law Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 153-176, 2009).Dimitry Kochenov, On Options of Citizens and Moral Choices of States: Gays and European Federalism, (Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2009).Heather Kennedy, Pleasant Grove v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]