Search for: "United States v. Pleasant" Results 81 - 100 of 216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2015, 10:35 am by Frances Rogers
The Court of Appeals erroneously relied upon its earlier decision in the case of International Union, United Auto, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers of Am. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:47 am by Kedar
Heller – Agreed 25-Mar United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 6:53 am
In 2000, the United States Supreme Court decided Troxel v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:15 pm
From the Feb. 2009 issue of Engage:Kimberlee Wood Colby, Monumentally Speaking: Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
It's always a pleasant surprise to see legal disputes that involve fish for nonsensical reasons, particularly fish-related disputes that may be heard by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
It's always a pleasant surprise to see legal disputes that involve fish for nonsensical reasons, particularly fish-related disputes that may be heard by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 10:05 am by Eugene Volokh
Throughout your career, you have consistently advocated positions on behalf of the United States in an exemplary manner. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:59 pm by Josh Blackman
" He said, "Taney is making the case that Black people who were enslaved were never part of the people of the United States and could never be citizens. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 1:07 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeEvidence Showed Defendant Knew Cathinone A Controlled Substance, Conspiracy to Distribute United States, appellee v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:02 am by Kashmir Hill
Cell phones are addictive, I suppose…The opinion cites United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Marcovitz, (Dalhousie Law Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 153-176, 2009).Dimitry Kochenov, On Options of Citizens and Moral Choices of States: Gays and European Federalism, (Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2009).Heather Kennedy, Pleasant Grove v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]