Search for: "United States v. Pledge" Results 1 - 20 of 980
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2017, 3:15 am by Scott Bomboy
Two historical groups added “to the flag of the United States of America. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:42 am by Old Fox
 Looking Backward describes the future United States as a regimented worker’s paradise where everyone has equal incomes, and men are drafted into the country’s “industrial army” at the age of 21, serving in the jobs assigned them by the state. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:05 pm by Christopher Bird
"Jurisprudence in the United States has long held that the Pledge of Allegiance cannot be made mandatory (most recently in Lane v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:10 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Yesterday, we filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the Supreme Court in a case called United States Agency for International Development v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In 1943 the Supreme Court overturned the Gobitis decision in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
United States, (Docket No. 10-1214, cert. denied 6/13/2011) (Order List). [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 2:54 pm by constitutional lawblogger
The United States Supreme Court today granted certiorari in United States Agency for International Development v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:00 am by Record on Appeal
In making its decision, the Fifth Circuit recognized that although the United States Supreme Court has never directly addressed the issue of the similar use of “one nature under God” in the national pledge, the Court “has suggested in dicta, time and again, that the pledge is constitutional. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am by INFORRM
United States Supreme Court Gonzalez v Google and Twitter v Taamneh. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 3:00 am
United States, No. 05-6629 (6th Cir. 1/12/07), has denied a deduction for the $5 million pledged by the developer of the House of Blues Atlanta as indemnification for losses sustained by the restaurant during... [read post]