Search for: "United States v. Plume"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2016, 7:36 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 7:45 am
(United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana – Indianapolis Division. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:58 am
Here is the opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 9:00 am
On September 3, 2021, the United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, vacated the lower court’s determination that liability for remediating the environmental harm associated with a groundwater plume was divisible under Section 107 of CERCLA. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 9:00 am
United States, 129 S. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:36 am
" The Appeals Court affirmed the decision and said, "There is no improper delegation to the EPA (compare United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 11:06 am
The Facts of the Case In the case of Elonis v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 10:13 am
Facts: This case (Varlen Corp. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 1:19 pm
United States FDA (D.D.C. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
Proveris Scientific Corp. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:08 am
Facts: This case (Cooper et al v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 9:04 am
In Burton v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:35 am
Proveris Scientific Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:51 am
<> EPA Awarding Close to $13 Million to Assist Small Drinking Water and Wastewater Systems Across the United States - U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:21 am
The principal question on appeal to the Seventh Circuit was whether the United States' claim for a mandatory injunction under RCRA was discharged in Apex's bankruptcy and, therefore, could not be renewed in a subsequent lawsuit. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:07 pm
(Save Livermore Downtown v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 4:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 2:42 pm
" United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:21 am
" The principal question on appeal to the Seventh Circuit was whether the United States' claim for a mandatory injunction under RCRA was discharged in Apex's bankruptcy and, therefore, could not be renewed in a subsequent lawsuit. [read post]
