Search for: "United States v. Poland" Results 221 - 240 of 477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat)   United States US General U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
Stiftelsen SINTEF (EPLAW)   Poland Voivodeship Administrative Court: Design, freedom and Polish law: VI SA / Wa 518/09 (Class 99)   Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia looking into setting up special IP courts (IP Factor)   South Africa Western Cape High Court finds in favour of Trimega, grants interim interdict preventing Real World Diagnostics from using IP related to drink-driving breathalysers (Afro-IP) (Afro-IP)   United Kingdom Civil Law Reform Bill: latest news… [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am by Marie Louise
Becton, Dickinson and Company (Patently-O) Patent malpractice litigation: State versus federal jurisdiction: Magnetek, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Class 46) Trading Standards officers uses new inspection powers granted under Copyright, Designs and Patent Act (Out-Law)   United States US General IP legislation to watch in 2009 (Law360) IP cases to follow in 2009 (Law360) US Trade Representative issues statement on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ContentAgenda) Does the Federal Circuit need a fresh viewpoint? [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
     PIRATES OF THE CARRIBEAN AND THE TEST OF SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITYThe United States District Court for the Central District of California went on to rule that Walt Disney’s “Pirates of the Caribbean” had not lifted copyrighted elements from the screenplay of the same name. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
(Spicy IP)   Italy Blocked Pirate Bay users flock to other torrent sites (TorrentFreak)   Poland Three arrested as police swoop on Rapidshare Link forum (TorrentFreak) Football fans play with lawyers – trade mark protection and critical website koniecpzpn.pl (end of Polish Football Association) (Class 46)   Russia Huge Russian BitTorrent site has domain suspended (TorrentFreak)   Sweden New anti-piracy task force set to pressure file-sharers (TorrentFreak) Illicit… [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
(Spicy IP)   Italy Blocked Pirate Bay users flock to other torrent sites (TorrentFreak)   Poland Three arrested as police swoop on Rapidshare Link forum (TorrentFreak) Football fans play with lawyers – trade mark protection and critical website koniecpzpn.pl (end of Polish Football Association) (Class 46)   Russia Huge Russian BitTorrent site has domain suspended (TorrentFreak)   Sweden New anti-piracy task force set to pressure file-sharers (TorrentFreak) Illicit… [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 10:30 am by Brian Cuban
  Many however, view it as an expression of  hatred towards Americans and the United States as a whole. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by Marie Louise
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
– EIPR article (PatLit)   United States US Patent Reform Dr. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:50 pm by mes286
Board of Education (1954) in the United States; Reference re Secession of Quebec (1998) in Canada; Décision Liberté d'association (1971) in France; the Lüth Judgment (1958) in Germany; and S v Makwanyane and Another (1995) in South Africa. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm by Bill Marler
The potentially affected FreshKampo and HEB products are past shelf life and no longer available for purchase in the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am by Kelly
Ambu AS (Patently-O) CAFC: Preamble held not limiting because body of claim sets forth complete invention: American Medical Systems v Biolitec (Filewrapper) District Court E D Michigan: General allegations of deceptive intent fail to state a claim for false marking: Josephs v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm by Tobias Thienel
(Rees v United Kingdom, para 49; Sheffield and Horsham v United Kingdom, para 66; see also Cossey v United Kingdom, paras 43, 46; I v United Kingdom (GC), para 78; Jaremowicz v Poland, para 48 ('right of a man and a woman to marry'))   The historical analysis of the original intent behind Article 12 doesn't help. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am by Marie Louise
Olm (Class 46)   Philippines The trials and tribulations of IP enforcement in the Philippines (IP Komodo)   Poland Lexus v Lexus (Class 46)   Switzerland Recipe for candied almonds insufficient to describe smell of candied almonds (Class 46)   Taiwan USPTO and Taiwan Intellectual Property Office launch Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program (Maier & Maier)   United States US Patents Deputy Director Teresa Stanek Rea – Report… [read post]