Search for: "United States v. Polite" Results 61 - 80 of 13,437
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2011, 5:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
Attorney General, the Montana Supreme Court upheld a ban on corporate expenditures to speak in support of or opposition to political candidates — pretty much the same sort of ban that the United States Supreme Court struck down in Citizens United v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V The requested Party shall not be bound to extradite its own nationals, but it shall have the power to extradite them in its discretion. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:58 am by Lawrence Solum
Michael Kent Curtis (Wake Forest University - School of Law) has posted Citizens United and Davis v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 11:07 am by INFORRM
The new law states social media platforms with more than 50 million users cannot ban people based on their political viewpoints. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 1:15 pm by Steve Gottlieb
— This commentary was broadcast on WAMC Northeast Report, July 12, 2016. [1] Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on February 21, 1923. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 4(1) states generally that extradition shall not be granted if the offense for which extradition is requested is a political offense. [read post]