Search for: "United States v. Ponte" Results 1 - 20 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2016, 2:40 am by Thomas Long
The Implications and Consequences of United Kingdom Exit from the EU by Patrick J Birkinshaw, Andrea Biondi (eds,)€ 125 The post USA: E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm by Laura Dooley and Rodger Citron
The Court denied Du Pont’s request to review the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s judgment affirming the jury’s $40 million award in favor of plaintiffs, a married couple, asserting negligence claims against Du Pont. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:37 pm by Gene Quinn
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a decision in Novozymes v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:18 am
Applicant Ramkumar is an individual who has filed a number of applications to register telecommunications and Internet-related marks in the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 3:22 am
The federal anti-dilution law mandates that a mark must be so widely known to everyone across the United States as to be in the category of “famous” marks. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:09 am
The article also stated that Double Coin's parent was seeking production facilities outside of China, including possibly the United States, in order to bring its tires sales back to the United States. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 2:44 am
The National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha’is of the United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
 I was perfectly content with my life until Jeremy suggested that I blog about the United States Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) Harry Winston v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:09 am by Sheppard Mullin
On June 25, 2010, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("TTAB") of the United States Patent and Trademark Office rendered its decision in the case of Valentino U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]