Search for: "United States v. Posner"
Results 301 - 320
of 742
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:03 am
In 1952, the United States was involved in the Korean War. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:38 am
" * * * Cavel International, the plaintiff in this case, owns and operates the only facility in the United States for slaughtering horses. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
(Pix from Penn State Law Website.) [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 1:08 pm
For those who don’t study white collar crime, the Supreme Court recently struck down, in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:22 am
Hugunin v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 11:35 am
Smith is Staff Counsel for Americans United for Life. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
Because a company and its president appealed a District Court's decision without an attorney, the appellate court dismissed the appeal.In United States of America v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:32 pm
In Oracle v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:29 am
Conventional wisdom says that the current iteration of the United States Supreme Court is pro-business. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:22 am
Writing on behalf of the Court, Circuit Judge Richard Posner recalled the decision in Silverman v CBS, in which the 2nd Circuit held that when a story falls into the public domain, its story elements - including its characters - slso do. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 7:30 am
United States, the case that upheld the Japanese internment, is more an anti-precedent than a precedent. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:00 pm
as Posner stated "serving cat and dog steaks" in Chicago restaurants? [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:47 am
California, supra; United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:37 pm
" Smith v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:03 am
After the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided last week to deny Apple's motion for a rehearing en banc (full-bench review) of the Nexus ruling, some commentators suggested that this was the end of Apple's push for sales bans against Samsung and, looking beyond that dispute, all makers of Android-based, patent-infringing devices. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:23 am
I guess the Oracle v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
The case is now pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 8:29 pm
In Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
