Search for: "United States v. Powell" Results 341 - 360 of 770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2009, 11:38 am by Terry Lenamon
However valid one may find this argument to be, federalism and the United States Supreme Court allow for this incongruity today. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:08 am by Jeff Gittins
 BILLS THAT PASSED House Bill 25: Application RevisionsRepresentative V. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 10:38 am by Gene Takagi
” Washington Post“More than 75,000 new cases were reported in the United States on Thursday, the second-highest daily total nationwide since the pandemic began. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:03 pm by admin
An IRS Summons is issued in good faith when it meets the four part test set forth in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
That trend was reversed following the Supreme Court’s decision in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 9:35 pm by Domenic Powell
United States, Gundy is challenging his conviction for failing to register as a sex offender under the Sex Offender Notification and Registration Act (SORNA). [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:41 pm
  One might justify what the Court did in Marschalk as stemming from the same pressures that led to the quick and decisive resolution of the Iranian claims isssue that prompted Dames & Moore itself, but in the typical case, a "GVR" in light of the new decision seems right on.Same, too, with the most recent well-known effort by a court of appeals to have the Supreme Court answer a certified question -- the en banc Second Circuit's 2005 certificate in… [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
  CITIZENS UNITED, ELANA KAGAN, AND THE QUESTION THAT HAD NO PLAUSIBLE ANSWERMost liberals and progressives view Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 1:30 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
United States, in which Justice Brandeis concurred, that the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market” and in 1974, Justice Powell wrote in Gertz v. [read post]