Search for: "United States v. Pretty Products, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
United Dominion Industries, Inc., 473 F.3d 532, 538 (3d Cir. 2007).There's no comparative fault in strict liability that would reduce a verdict where the plaintiff did something stupid. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
Blackpowder Products, Inc., No. 4:06-cv-00169-RAW, slip op. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc., 682 F. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:20 am by Bexis
Pennzoil Products Co., 305 F.3d 368, 372-74 (5th Cir. 2002) (not an FDCA case); Dial A Car, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:16 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States Courts of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has always been viewed as being more sympathetic to patent holders than to alleged infringers--but not in every single aspect of patent law. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  Cars are simply too far afield, so even for a United States Supreme Court decision, we won’t dilute the drug/device nature of our list that much.1. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
  Generally, government employees are immune from discovery in private litigation under rules first set out in United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am by Bexis
Arrow International, Inc., 2011 WL 780684, slip op. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 5:54 am
Because the "Supremacy Clause" of the United States Constitution says so: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land . . . . [read post]