Search for: "United States v. Public Utilities Commission of Cal."
Results 61 - 80
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation maintains operations and well sites throughout the United States and contracts with third party staffing companies to acquire laborers and consultants. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
California State Lands Commission (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 476. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
In the process, these changes have saved lives here in the United States and abroad, and prevented countless injuries. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Fish & Game Commission (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105; Health First v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Fish & Game Commission (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105; Health First v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:37 pm
(Neighbors for Smart Nail v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Bank v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
Miss United States of America, LLC. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
The FPA requires entities seeking to operate a dam, reservoir, or hydroelectric power plant in the United States to secure licensure from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”). [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Fish & Game Commission (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105; Health First v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:24 pm
Despite lobbying efforts by the business community, employers cannot require that this leave be exhausted before using leave available under the Cal/OSHA ETS. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:05 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
CALPERS: SECURITIES ACT STATUTE OF REPOSE NOT SUBJECT TO EQUITABLE TOLLING In California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
As is customary, my remarks this morning are in my official capacity as Director of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Enforcement, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission, the Commissioners, or other members of the staff. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am
Public Utilities Commission echoed this.[230] Thus, for instance, if the government requires platforms to allow all speakers, it can't exclude from that protection pro-terrorist speakers or racist speakers or anti-police speakers.[231] To be sure, this might prove to be a poison pill that would keep some legislators from supporting common carrier mandates. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
And the table of contents of the CDA[14] is particularly telling: TITLE V—OBSCENITY AND VIOLENCE Subtitle A—Obscene, Harassing, and Wrongful Utilization of Telecommunications Facilities [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Cal.). [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
Jan. 27, 2016); Bartnett v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
The political economy of international standard setting in financial reporting: how the United States led the adoption of IFRS across the world. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm
On the federal front, the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
