Search for: "United States v. Pugh"
Results 41 - 54
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
Just 5 years ago, the United States Supreme Court upheld a taking of property for purely economic reasons. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:54 am
Though perhaps illogical, the verdicts may stand ( see, United States v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 8:49 pm
Pugh, 420 U.S. 103, 119 (1975); United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 3:49 pm
” See also United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:34 pm
The seizure violated the 4thAmendment to the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:58 am
By James Pugh & Dave Lanferman On October 22, 2009, the California Supreme Court decided not to review the Court of Appeal's decision in the landmark Palmer/Sixth Street Properties v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Eleventh Circuit, with a pretty tough panel (Chief Judge Edmondson, and Judges Tjoflat and Hill) affirmed a below guidelines sentence in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 1:10 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 2:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:30 am
The shift in strategy resulted in much of the firm's growth in 2007 coming out of the western United States. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Dissenting Member Walsh stated: Sound policy considerations underlie the statute's requirement that the showing of interest supporting a deauthorization election must be collected after the employees are subject to a union-security clause. [read post]
