Search for: "United States v. Quality Stores, Inc" Results 121 - 140 of 280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Schutz Container Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:41 pm by Greg Mersol
Posted by Greg MersolToday, June 20, 2011, the Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Wal-Mart Stores Inc v Dukes.pdf Case No. 10-277 (U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The Basics of RFRA Challenges: Hobby Lobby Puts Pressure on the “Sincerity” Prong The Hobby Lobby chain of stores, according to the Court’s majority, is a corporate person that shares its majority owners’ fundamentalist Christian beliefs. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:37 pm by Lara
“G.A.P Adventures shall have until September 1, 2011, to transition to a new name in the United States,” the June 24, 2011 federal court order states. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
 The court then began its analysis of the false light issues by explaining that Rooks owns Parkland Realty, Inc., and Parkland Investments, Inc. . . . [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am by Florian Mueller
The claim about "more mature content for more serious gaming" is something that with my games industry background (once the first person to work for Blizzard outside the United States) and my own experience playing games I have to reject: it's just not true that mature content implies or fosters serious gaming. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
A few of those are as follows: In the closely watched matter of United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm by Mark Walsh
Kennedy with the decision in United States v. [read post]