Search for: "United States v. Raines" Results 121 - 140 of 378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2020, 11:19 am by Joseph Koncelik
The NWPR replaces the Obama Administration’s “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) rule. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:34 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Dallas Division issued an opinion in September 2013, that is worth reading. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Circuit panel explained that this suit was clearly barred by existing Supreme Court precedent, Raines v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:42 am by Kristi Tousignant
It will also hear arguments in a case looking at copyright protections, considering whether they extend to books and other intellectual property made overseas, but sold in the United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:55 pm by Lyle Denniston
  She was appointed by the Court to make those arguments in the case of United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:55 am
“Environmentally sustainable buildings”, “rain harvesting” and “off-the-grid innovations” have been bandied about for years, but are now gaining credibility.The growth of green building in South Africa trumps that of established sustainability building regions such as Europe, Australia, United States, United Arab Emirates, Singapore and Brazil.This has been confirmed by United States-based McGraw-Hill… [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:43 am by Marc Mayerson
No one should be surprised that the United States Court of Appeals today reversed the decision of the Louisiana District Court on whether losses occasioned by rising water in New Orleans was the result of a "flood" and thus excluded from coverage under several different forms of "flood" exclusion. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:43 am by Marc Mayerson
No one should be surprised that the United States Court of Appeals today reversed the decision of the Louisiana District Court on whether losses occasioned by rising water in New Orleans was the result of a "flood" and thus excluded from coverage under several different forms of "flood" exclusion. [read post]