Search for: "United States v. Ramirez" Results 261 - 280 of 348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2010, 1:32 am by Mike
 Judge William Alsup stated the United States Supreme Court 'has not yet made a clear ruling that admission of irrelevant or overtly prejudicial evidence constitutes a due process violation sufficient to warrant issuance of the writ.' Holley v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Supp. 151, 156-57 (S.D.N.Y. 1988).Deference to the FDA was the express basis of the decision in Ramirez v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  Cars are simply too far afield, so even for a United States Supreme Court decision, we won’t dilute the drug/device nature of our list that much.1. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 9:43 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The Court rejects the argument advanced by the United States, as amicus, that this amounted to “informational injury” that was sufficient to confer standing. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Ramirez, Justice William Rehnquist said that Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment – which was arguably intended to protect the voting rights of freed slaves by sanctioning states that disenfranchised them – exempts disenfranchisement based on a felony conviction. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 9:11 am by South Florida Lawyers
But the judge is not done:  In my view, to affirm what happened here requires that we turn a blind eye to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the Florida Bar Rules of Professional Conduct, and the Code of Judicial Conduct, to say nothing of the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Florida.Ok, but no traffic safety rules were violated, so it's not all bad. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:02 pm
United States District Court Judge James Robertson for the District of Columbia, issued an order in USA v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:15 am by Don Cruse
STATE OF TEXAS, No. 14-0226 Disposed on orders list of May 8, 2015 CITY OF DALLAS v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
United States (2005) - felon firearm possession ban doesn't cover foreign convictionsTennessee v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The diverging approaches of the majority and the dissenters in United States v. [read post]