Search for: "United States v. Riddle" Results 61 - 80 of 219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2018, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
After reading the opinion in a recent Tax Court case, Najafpir v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Celestine McConville
Hawaii, it is clear that the scope of the Establishment Clause is different when challenging executive exercise of foreign affairs powers, particularly executive decisions regarding admission into the United States. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:48 pm by John Floyd
This definition is drawn from Section 16 of Title 18 of the United States Code. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:07 am by Andrew Keane Woods
Microsoft produced the transactional records it held on its data centers in the United States, but declined to produce the customer’s emails that it said were stored on a data center in Ireland. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:38 am by dawn
A 2013 Senate investigation found that Apple has structured two Irish subsidiaries to be tax residents of neither the United States, where they are managed and controlled, nor Ireland, where they are incorporated. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:26 pm by Patricia Salkin
Although the court’s analysis of the prior restraint claim noted that regulation lacked a close nexus to expression, the court could have disposed of the case by reviewing it under United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
WHETHER [APPELLEE] WAS DENIED RIGHTS GRANTED TO HIM BY THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND PENNSYLVANIA CONSTITUTION WHEN INADMISSIBLE HEARSAY, IN THE FORM OF A NOTE AND EMAIL FROM [APPELLEE'S] DECEASED WIFE, WAS ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE AND USED BY THE COMMONWEALTH TO SECURE A CONVICTION ON THE CHARGE OF MURDER? [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
“[R]emarks about a local public official constituted political speech and were at the core of the speech that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects. [read post]
Declassified documents show that a single service provider facilitates upstream surveillance at “seven major international chokepoints in the United States. [read post]