Search for: "United States v. Ritchie"
Results 41 - 60
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2013, 7:09 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 12:24 pm
It is this dreadful feature of our political system, NOT required by the Constitution, that explains why it now counts as "success" if the United States doesn't go over a "cliff" or continues to pay its debts, as against genuinely confronting the serious problems that face us as a polity. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 11:53 am
The statute (Section 2711) defines governmental entity as "a department or agency of the United States or any State or political subdivision thereof." [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:52 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 6:35 pm
She has registered the phrase as a trademark with the United States Patent & Trademark Office. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:44 am
" (ellipsis in original) (quoting United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
Daniels of the United States District Court (SDNY), and Joel R. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:55 am
United States, 221 U.S. 325, 330 (1911). [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 5:59 am
Luxco, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am
Yet, keeping scandalous and immoral matter outside the contours of the United States trademark registration program has been part of federal law even longer, going all the way back to the 1905 Act, so there is a large mountain to climb in saying the Constitution has been violated as part of the federal government’s trademark registration program for more than 100 years. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
The opposer contended that the mark SOCK IT UP was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, and therefore JY Instyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 7:50 am
This list was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
Ritchie and Kay Whitlock Race and the Death Penalty: The Legacy of “McCleskey v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:12 am
RITCHIE, ET AL. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube… [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:01 am
United States, 174 U. [read post]
