Search for: "United States v. Rocha" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2023, 2:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court vacated the affirmance in June 2022, when it granted Uber’s petition for writ of certiorari and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 7:00 am by Jonathan Pyzer
(M.S.) 2013 ABPC)Taking pictures up a female’s skirt (R v Rocha 2012 ABPC)Recording a roommate and the roommate’s girlfriend having sex (R v Pan 2012 ABPC)Making videos of sexual activity between accused and accused’s partner without consent, posting the videos on Facebook, and sending links of the video to friends (R v Desilva 2011 ONCJ)What is a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy? [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 2:29 am by INFORRM
Breyer, Supreme Court of the United States ·      Honorable Justice D.Y. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 19 July 2018 there was a statement in open court [doc] in the case of Roberto Carlos da Silva Rocha v (1) Westdeutscher Rundfunk Koln (2) Associated Newspapers Ltd before Nicklin J concerniing a false allegation of drug use against the Brazilian footballer Roberto Carlos. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 10:49 am
Doroteo Rocha-Alvarado molests a nine-year old girl, gets deported from the United States, and then is caught illegally reentering the country. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
Taken by itself and out of context, the question "Is it acceptable that the European Union abandons its powers in favour of the Member States? [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
Bad news came for petitioners in two capital cases, Rocha v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
Bad news came for petitioners in two capital cases, Rocha v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
United States (relisted after the 9/26 Conference) Docket:  10-9333 Issue(s):  Whether the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
   United States v. [read post]