Search for: "United States v. Rodriguez-Rivera" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2023, 1:16 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Rodriguez Sanchez was not legally in the United States and was not able to return to North Carolina. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
The first was United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:31 am by Susan Brenner
As the Court of Appeals noted, United States Secret Service Agent William Slavoski filed a civil rights complaint (pursuant to 42 U.S.Code § 1983) against employees of the Pennsylvania State Police (`PSP’), including Commissioner Frank Pawlowski, Mervin Rodriguez, John Rice, Francis Hacken, Bryon Devlin, Willard Oliphant, Huascar Rivera, and Pedro Rivera (collectively `Defendants’). [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:10 pm
" The case is Hispanics United of Buffalo v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:28 am
Lee-Riveras ("On appeal the defendant claims that (1) his due process right to a fair trial, as guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment to the United State constitution, was violated when the state elicited testimony describing his silence after he had received a Miranda warning in violation of Doyle v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Don Cruse
The Court also filled out its March 3 argument calendar by re-setting some previously granted cases: Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. [read post]