Search for: "United States v. Rojas" Results 21 - 40 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
It also states that "on 25 March 2008, the Supreme Court of the United States determined in the case of José Ernesto Medellín Rojas . . . that the Judgment itself did not directly require U.S. courts to provide review and reconsideration under domestic law" and that "while expressly recognizing the United States obligation to comply with the Judgment under international law, [it]… [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 5:51 pm
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled SECTION 1. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 6:34 pm by AALRR
In particular, the Ninth Circuit held that Rojas' wage and hour claims are barred by the Free Exercise Clause and by the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
” At frESH, Danelle Gagliardi and Matthew Rojas analyze Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 8:59 am
José Ernesto Medellín Rojas, César Roberto Fierro Reyna, Rubén Ramírez Cárdenas, Humberto Leal García, and RobertoMoreno Ramos are not executed pending judgment on the Request forinterpretation submitted by the United Mexican States, unless anduntil these five Mexican nationals receive review… [read post]