Search for: "United States v. Rosenstein"
Results 1 - 20
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2018, 3:15 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, about whether that agency’s administrative law judges are “officers” of the United States under the Constitution’s appointments clause. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:50 am
II, defined to include “all persons who can be said to hold an office under the government” in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
This action is a byproduct of several state and federal actions commenced by plaintiff, a dual citizen of the United States and Brazil who resides in Brazil. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
This action is a byproduct of several state and federal actions commenced by plaintiff, a dual citizen of the United States and Brazil who resides in Brazil. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 4:55 am
After several weeks, United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 3:53 am
In his majority opinion in National Labor Relations Board V. [read post]
21 May 2018, 12:04 am
”[1] DAG Rosenstein noted that the “aim” of the new policy “is to enhance relationships with our law enforcement partners in the United States and abroad, while avoiding unfair duplicative penalties. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:55 am
Summarily terminating a federal officer holding a term appointment from his or her positionPHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, USCA District of Columbia Circuit, Docket #15-1177NYPPL earlier summarized the decision in PHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a decision in which the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit considered the issue of summarily removing a public officer holding a… [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:55 am
Rosenstein]. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:29 pm
ICYMI: Last Weekend on Lawfare Brenna Gautam and Julia Solomon-Strauss provided a comprehensive summary of last week’s military commission proceedings in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:15 am
Circuit (Judges Henderson, Rogers and Srinivasan) will hear argument in Miller v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:30 am
United States, 28 F.2d 1017 (2d Cir. 1928)Rouda v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm
As to Miller’s position that Congress has not authorized Mueller’s work by statute, the court simply pointed to United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:44 am
United States in the Trump v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:17 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 7:18 pm
Indictment U.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:39 am
Rosenstein thanked Special Assistant United States Attorney Daren Firestone and Assistant United States Attorney David I. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:39 am
Rosenstein thanked Special Assistant United States Attorney Daren Firestone and Assistant United States Attorney David I. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 7:01 am
Meanwhile, Brenna Gautam and Julia Solomon-Strauss provided us with a detailed breakdown of last week’s military commissions hearings in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 11:41 am
Across court documents, the Justice Department cites United States v. [read post]
