Search for: "United States v. Ross" Results 381 - 400 of 860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2020, 4:13 pm by Amy Howe
The justices will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel looks at the decision. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:58 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Supreme Court of this state has never decided this question, in so far as we have been able to ascertain, but we are not left in the dark in the matter, because we find that no less eminent authority than the Supreme Court of the United States long ago decided this very question. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:51 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  KV further states that it employs personnel in the United States in positions ranging from specialized technical research and development staff to marketing and administrative staff. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 12:41 pm
The words “citizens of the United States,” and “citizens of the States,” as employed in the fourteenth amendment, did not change or modify the relations of citizens of the State and nation as they existed under the original Constitution. . . . [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
United States, characterizing it as “one of several recent signs that ideology does not always fuel the justices’ decisions. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
United States, 380 U.S. 24 (1965) McKeiver v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a case involving flood damage allegedly resulting from the government’s failure to protect the banks of a canal in Louisiana from erosion, and make clear that “when the government, whether through action or inaction, takes private property, it has a distinct, well-established responsibility to compensate landowners. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 12:52 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeComputers Denied Suppression Despite Seizure Pursuant to Warrant Issued on 'Tainted Evidence' United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 12:35 pm
United Technologies Corp., 487 U.S. 500, 512 (1988), which immunizes a federal government contractor from liability for design defects when “(1) the United States approved reasonably precise specifications; (2) the equipment conformed to those specifications; and (3) the supplier warned the United States about the dangers in the use of the equipment that were known to the supplier but not to the United States. [read post]