Search for: "United States v. Russell" Results 241 - 260 of 1,630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2015, 3:23 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has stated that there are two critical elements necessary to make a criminal or penal law ex post facto: 1) it must be retrospective, and 2) it must disadvantage the offender affected by it, (Champelle v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am by Amy Howe
(argued April 16, 2018): U.S. laws generally apply only to conduct that happens in the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:59 am by Gary Nitzkin
So why did the United States Supreme Court accept this case for review? [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
United States Postal Service, in which the court held that the government is not a “person” who can challenge the validity of a patent under the America Invents Act, for this blog. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:14 am by Carl Folsom
United States to keep prior drug convictions from triggering certain "mandatory" sentencing enhancements (ACCA and 851 enhancements):At issue in Shepard was whether a state burglary conviction triggered the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), a federal recidivist statute. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 6:12 am by jonathanturley
Even before Dobbs, the rate of abortion had been falling steadily in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Dale Carpenter discusses the amicus brief he filed in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 3:01 pm by Joe Patrice
United States, concerning the treaty power. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:54 am by Amy Howe
It has been a week since the Court announced that it would review United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:58 am by Amy Howe
  In United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:23 am by Anna Christensen
United States, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am by Jay Willis
Florida, United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am by Amy Howe
” At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice and Comment, Daniel Hemel discusses United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which it is considering whether a conspiracy to commit extortion requires the conspirators to agree to obtain property from someone outside the conspiracy, and the arbitration case DIRECTV v. [read post]