Search for: "United States v. Ryan"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
Va. 1954), observed that "we have found no authority in the United States which holds that mere defamation can be enjoined," and therefore reversed an anti-libel injunction. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm
He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:27 am
V. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 12:00 pm
” Federal Ryan Haight Act and Public Health Emergency Exception In addition to the Georgia rules, the federal Ryan Haight Act must be considered. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 12:00 pm
” Federal Ryan Haight Act and Public Health Emergency Exception In addition to the Georgia rules, the federal Ryan Haight Act must be considered. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm
In the Atlantic, Mary Ziegler (Florida State University), "The Justices Are Telling Us What They Think About Roe v. [read post]
Guest Post: DABUS Gains Traction: South Africa Becomes First Country to Recognize AI-Invented Patent
4 Aug 2021, 2:30 pm
Notably, their application has been denied by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), and the European Patent Office (EPO). [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 12:06 am
The United States will not follow our lead – there are Constitutional, statutory and procedural barriers to permitting US patent applications naming non-human inventors. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 12:06 am
The United States will not follow our lead – there are Constitutional, statutory and procedural barriers to permitting US patent applications naming non-human inventors. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
In an 1838 case, Buddington v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Hendricks, Ainsley Weston, “Silicosis Mortality Trends and New Exposures to Respirable Crystalline Silica — United States, 2001–2010,&r [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:10 am
Attorney Gen. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm
United States The manager of a New York City Shake Shack restaurant said he was unlawfully detained by police and “taunted” after he was falsely accused last year of poisoning three officers’ milkshakes. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:45 pm
§1930 (a) and any other fee prescribed by the Judicial Conference of the United States under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 5:48 am
Lawfare AssociateAssistant Editor Bryce Klehm sat down with Ryan Hass, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, for a wide-ranging discussion on the United States’s China policy. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:10 am
Notable Cast: Ruth Negga, Joel Edgerton, and Will Dalton.Director: Jeff NicholsYear: 2016IMDB Rating: 7.0/10Memorable Quote: “You realize this case could alter the Constitution of the United States? [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:08 pm
Ryan renders the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, which precludes a federal court from considering evidence outside the state-court record when reviewing the merits of a claim for habeas relief if a prisoner or his attorney has failed to diligently develop the claim’s factual basis in state court, inapplicable to a federal court’s merits review of a claim for habeas relief. [read post]
