Search for: "United States v. SCRAP" Results 121 - 140 of 308
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2016, 6:08 am by Mark Rienzi
At the federal level, this hostility resulted in the near passage of an amendment to the United States Constitution prohibiting any state funding of “sectarian” schools. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm by familoo
On the one hand, we have the European Convention on Human Rights, which is directly applicable in the United Kingdom, but is largely confined to negative rights (to be free from interference), some of which have been interpreted as having a positive component requiring the State to protect us from each other. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
The Spanish Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Google Spain on the right to be forgotten, which means that claims concerning the right to be forgotten should be submitted directly to Google Inc in the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
The Turnbull government has approved a media law shake up, scrapping two keys laws in a move which could unleash a wave of mergers. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:34 pm by Larry
United States is about a discovery dispute. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
  A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 12:54 pm by John Floyd
  This was illustrated in the December 17, 2015 decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 7:54 pm by Michael Shlansky
  TWI contends that they first became aware of the spill on December 15, 2009, when it received notice from the United States Coast Guard, naming TWI as the responsible party. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Most other States have experienced unacceptably long processing and adjudication delays. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 12:53 pm by Seth Jaffe
  The most recent manifestation of this ambiguity was in Thursday’s decision in United States v. [read post]