Search for: "United States v. Sacks" Results 21 - 40 of 313
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Private equity firms buy businesses b/c of the brand, sack the workforce, find cheaper ways of making thing [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  It is not the case that such an election process to the United States House of Representatives is required by the United States Constitution. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  The work has been comprehensively updated to take in the latest case including Lachaux, Stocker, Serafin, Lloyd v Google, Economou, Wright v Ver, Wright v Granath, Corbyn v Millett, Duchess of Sussex v Associated, and Soriano v Forensic News. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am by Dan Lopez
And one of the things, especially for the book College Athletes for Hire: The Evolution and Legacy of the NCAA’s Amateur Myth, I worked with Allen Sack who had played formally at the University of Notre Dame and also was on the academic side of things. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Postiglione v Sacks & Sacks, LLP  2022 NY Slip Op 30148(U) January 19, 2022 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 513779/19 Judge: Karen B. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 8:26 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court ultimately says the parole officers were allowed to search a parolee's house, where they found guns and narcotics.The case is United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 8:54 am by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:29 pm by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
The joint note verbale also cites the 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
He finds that the defendant in this case was denied proper representation because counsel did not object to questionable eyewitness and other evidence.The case is United States v. [read post]