Search for: "United States v. Salazar" Results 1 - 20 of 305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2010, 1:58 am by sally
Salazar-Duarte v Government of the United States of America [2010] EWHC 3150 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 313 “For the purposes of s 103(9) of the Extradition Act 2003, the person whose extradition was sought was deemed to be informed of the extradition order against him when the solicitors acting on his behalf received a letter, whether by post, fax or e-mail, which informed him that the order had been made. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:41 am by Kate Fort
Along with their Complaint, the Harvest plaintiffs moved the district court for a temporary restraining order; the United States responded by filing Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, respectively. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The State of Kansas (“the State”) was permitted to intervene as of right under Fed. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
An addendum includes the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:35 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:38 am by Joel R. Brandes
In late 2012, Galvan requested Salazar’s assistance in obtaining a passport and visa for D.S. to visit the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 6:39 pm
Here goes:"Salazar-Luviano is a fifty-five-year-old citizen of Mexico, originally admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident in 1976. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:47 pm by Liskow & Lewis
By Jason Johanson On Friday, March 6, 2009, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar stated that the agency is considering an appeal to the United States Supreme Court of the decision in Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 4:03 am by John L. Welch
Hermilo Tamez Salazar, 108 USPQ2d 1063 (TTAB 2013) [precedential].Applicant Salazar admitted in his interrogatory answers, and in a declaration filed with the Board, that he had not used the subject mark on any product sold in the United States and had not shipped any product into the United States. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:27 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]