Search for: "United States v. Salazar" Results 1 - 20 of 275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2010, 1:58 am by sally
Salazar-Duarte v Government of the United States of America [2010] EWHC 3150 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 313 “For the purposes of s 103(9) of the Extradition Act 2003, the person whose extradition was sought was deemed to be informed of the extradition order against him when the solicitors acting on his behalf received a letter, whether by post, fax or e-mail, which informed him that the order had been made. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:41 am by Kate Fort
Along with their Complaint, the Harvest plaintiffs moved the district court for a temporary restraining order; the United States responded by filing Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, respectively. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The State of Kansas (“the State”) was permitted to intervene as of right under Fed. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
An addendum includes the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 6:39 pm
Here goes:"Salazar-Luviano is a fifty-five-year-old citizen of Mexico, originally admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident in 1976. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:47 pm by Liskow & Lewis
By Jason Johanson On Friday, March 6, 2009, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar stated that the agency is considering an appeal to the United States Supreme Court of the decision in Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 4:03 am by John L. Welch
Hermilo Tamez Salazar, 108 USPQ2d 1063 (TTAB 2013) [precedential].Applicant Salazar admitted in his interrogatory answers, and in a declaration filed with the Board, that he had not used the subject mark on any product sold in the United States and had not shipped any product into the United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 9:53 am by John Elwood
United States, there are only four cases undecided from the October sitting: United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 8:32 am by John Elwood
Kentucky, there are only three cases undecided from the Supreme Court’s October sitting: United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 12:56 pm by brian
In 1866, the tribes had to make new treaties with the United States to regain their land and trust beneficiary status, according to the complaint. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am by Gabriel Schoenfeld
If one considers the six characteristics enumerated by Brzezinski and Friedrich, not a single one of them obtains in the United States. [read post]