Search for: "United States v. Sample" Results 21 - 40 of 1,998
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2015, 1:35 pm by Michael Knapp
United States, or its decision in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 2:03 pm by Aaron Rubin
Furman of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied the BlackRock Plaintiffs’ request to use sampling to prove their case against an RMBS trustee in BlackRock Balanced Capital Portfolio (FI) v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:53 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: From 2002 to 2009, the United States Supreme Court decided three cases directly bearing on one of the most notable, or perhaps notorious, examples of American exceptionalism — state judicial elections. [read post]
As expected after oral arguments, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals declined to decide whether parties may use statistical sampling to prove False Claims Act liability in United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:41 pm by Mike
He can't be sued, thanks to the great big forcefield the United States Supreme Court put around him. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 10:15 am by Shea Denning
Four years after a plurality of the United States Supreme Court in Mitchell v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:15 pm by Kevin
United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat and 982.34 Pounds of American Paddlefish Caviar (hereinafter, United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 2:31 am
Sampling of musical recordings is a topic that excites a lot of people in the United States, where the bulk of the world's litigation on that subject appears to have taken place. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:56 am by Matt Kurnick
By the time the devices were imported into the United States, the Myval System had been approved for use in India and Europe, but not in the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:05 pm by Liz Kurtz
Has coverage of yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:26 am by The Federalist Society
 Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan.To discuss the case, we have Mary Beth Buchanan, who is an Ethics and Reputational Risk Officer at the United Nations and a  former United States Attorney. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:26 am by The Federalist Society
 Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan.To discuss the case, we have Mary Beth Buchanan, who is an Ethics and Reputational Risk Officer at the United Nations and a  former United States Attorney. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 7:28 am by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court decided in Citizens United v. [read post]