Search for: "United States v. Sample" Results 141 - 160 of 1,998
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2015, 10:34 am by MBettman
Justice Frankfurter’s concurrence found that the Eighth and Fifth Amendments were not applicable to states, a position that has since been rejected. ) United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:28 pm by Luke Rioux
McNeely the United States Supreme Court held that police must normally get a warrant before taking a non-consensual blood sample to test a driver's blood alcohol level. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:28 am
ToxicCleanup_Army Corp Eng.jpg In prosecution for knowingly violating standards for handling asbestos-containing materials, evidence from ceiling material samples was relevant and admissible even though the samples had been collected over a year after the defendant's indictment and were taken from structures on which the defendant did not work; undisputed evidence that all building ceilings at the work site were made of the same materials allowed a reasonable… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:22 am by Matt Sundquist
At Cato@Liberty, John Samples discusses the bill recently introduced by Senator Charles Schumer and Representative Chris Van Hollen in response to the Court’s decision in Citizens United. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:43 pm
Although urinalysis results may often be sufficiently reliable evidence that the opportunity for crossexamination is unnecessary for due process purposes, see United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm by Cicely Wilson
Maryland v King, United States Supreme Court (6/3/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawAfter his arrest on first- and second-degree assault charges, King was processed through a Wicomico County, Maryland, facility, where personnel used a cheek swab to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA Collection Act (Act), which authorizes officers to collect DNA samples from persons charged with violent crimes. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 8:08 pm by Phil Cave
CAAFLog is reporting that CAAF has granted the following issue in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Lisa Salazar
Specifically K-V wants a ban on the importation of all 17 HPC “except as authorized by [K-V]” and to prevent the sale or solicitation of 17 HPC within the United States from any imported source unless authorized by K-V. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:28 am by doug
The United States Supreme Court typically hears less than one hundred full cases each year, and out of that small sample, usually only one or two involve the federal bankruptcy laws. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:32 am
This time it's the United States District Court for the District of Kansas ordering summary judgment for the United States on March 10, 2009 in an interpleader action styled Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v Carrie R. [read post]