Search for: "United States v. Santana"
Results 101 - 120
of 128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
Rather:A federal court may act as a judicial pioneer when interpreting the United States Constitution and federal law. . . . [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:14 am
Bailon-Santana, 429 F.3d 1258 (9th Cir. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 9:15 pm
The Sisters of Bon Secours in the United States, Incorporated v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 11:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Bradford, MA; Jose Santana, President) Amaral Carpentry, Inc. [read post]
20 May 2009, 2:36 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 8:14 am
This conclusion is dictated by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Santana. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm
Santana v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
United States v Roberts, 618 F2d 530), nor did her testimony usurp the jury's function to assess the informant's credibility (see People v Hayes, 226 AD2d 1055, 1056 lv denied 88 NY2d 936). [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:37 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 10:13 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 1:16 pm
We next reject Wear's contention that our decision is controlled by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Welsh v. [read post]
31 May 2008, 12:55 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 5:46 pm
Thirteen other research libraries in the United States listed in the OCLC Worldcat indicate that they hold copies of the Alvarez book, so I have requested a copy through my library’s interlibrary loan service. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 7:38 am
Could "The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down," composed by a Canadian, really have integrated so much anguish, nostalgia and disappointment on one track without the input of Helm, the one Band member who actually hailed from the United States? [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 6:18 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 12:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
