Search for: "United States v. Santiago" Results 81 - 100 of 186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2016, 9:58 am by Karen Hoffmann
 She is an expert on women’s human rights, the human rights of youth in conflict with the law, and human rights advocacy in the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 6:26 am by Just Security
Analyzing State Employment Authorization for Noncitizens in the US by Ahilan Arulanantham (@ahilan_toolong) FISA Surveillance Reform The Year of Section 702 Reform, Part V: The HPSCI Majority FISA Working Group Report by Elizabeth Goitein (@LizaGoitein) and Noah Chauvin (@NoahChauvin) Biden Administration: Spy Tools The Biden Administration Should Continue Rebuffing NSO Group’s Latest Lobbying Efforts by Talya Nevins, Nicole Mo and Carrie DeCell (@cmd_dc) Supreme Court Ethics… [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
  The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts denied ALS’s motion to vacate, finding that manifest disregard of the law was no longer a basis for vacating or modifying arbitration awards in light of Hall Street and the First Circuit’s recent decision in Ramos-Santiago v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 8:38 am by Zachary C. Jackson
On Friday, Google asked the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to dismiss another lawsuit (Santiago v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:38 am by Zachary C. Jackson
On Friday, Google asked the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to dismiss another lawsuit (Santiago v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 1:10 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Criminal Practice Memo Not Shown to Be Newly Discovered Evidence Or Exculpatory; Rule 33 New Trial Motion Denied United States v. [read post]